Friday, August 16, 2019

The $3.4 Trillion Retirees Aren’t Getting From Social Security



A new study's findings, and what could get more money in retirees' pockets

By Laurence J. Kotlikoff
Social Security expert
July 1, 2019

United Income, a financial planning advisory service, just released an important study called, “The Retirement Solution Hiding In Plain Sight.” Using government data and proprietary software, it calculates how much money retirees have lost, and are losing, by making mistakes about when to start claiming Social Security benefits. United Income’s answer: a whopping $3.4 trillion or $111,000 per household!

That’s enough to move half of the oldest Americans now in poverty out of that terrible state. Put another way, according to United Income, the average Social Security recipient would get 9% more income in retirement by making the “financially optimal” decision about when to claim benefits.

Increasing Your Social Security Benefit By 177%
According to United Income, someone who’d get a $725 monthly Social Security benefit by starting to claim at 62 (the earliest age) would see a benefit increase to $1,280 by delaying to age 70 — an increase of 177%.

By United Income’s calculations, however, only 4% of retirees make the financially optimal Social Security claiming decision. The rest of them are claiming too early. United Income estimates that 92% of retirees would be better off waiting to claim until at least 65.

The study’s conclusion: if boomer workers would take the most appropriate Social Security benefits at the right time, they’d increase their prospects for financial security in retirement.

““A daunting task awaits individuals striving to make an optimal Social Security claiming decision.”

he team that produced the study includes these impressive people: Jason Fichtner, a former chief economist and acting deputy commissioner at the Social Security Administration; Kevin Whitman, a former Social Security Administration policy research director and Matt Fellowes, CEO of United Income, who has had an impressive career studying and delivering personal financial services.

The United Income study indicates significant attention to detail and uses the best available data to answer its question about optimal Social Security claiming. So, as someone who has been a Social Security analyst for decades and co-wrote Get What’s Yours: The Secrets to Maxing Out Your Social Security, I take its estimates seriously.

Personally, I would have made different methodological choices. But, in the end, I too would likely have arrived at a figure for lost Social Security benefits running in the trillions.

6 Reasons Why Retirees Are Leaving Trillions on the Table
So why are retirees leaving trillions on the table? And how can those trillions be used to support Americans in retirement?

As United Income’s report says, “a daunting task awaits individuals striving to make an optimal decision.”

There are, I think, six reasons people make the “wrong” Social Security moves:

First, many, if not most, people in the second half of life, are cash poor. They can’t wait until age 70 to collect their retirement benefit when they’d be roughly 70% higher, after inflation, than if they started claiming at 62.

Second, retirees don’t know how to value the extra Social Security benefits they’d receive in the future from exercising patience. Indeed, virtually none of the Social Security claiming tools from financial services companies I’ve seen get optimal claiming right. They focus on the actuarial value of benefits. This is off base, since any given household can’t play the actuarial averages. Social Security — by paying benefits in the form of inflation-adjusted income that don’t stop until you die — insures you against this financially catastrophic event. Properly valuing Social Security requires correctly incorporating the value of its insurance.

Third, the vast majority of retirees don’t use any Social Security software to make what, for many, is their most important financial decision.

The fourth reason is that retirees fear they will die before collecting what they are owed from Social Security. “Take your benefits. You could die tomorrow,” is what many Social Security staffers inappropriately tell people when they make benefit inquiries. But none of us will be kicking ourselves in heaven for not taking Social Security early. The real danger is not dying and kicking yourself in heaven for the money you could’ve received.

The fifth reason people take their Social Security benefits too early is they think they can invest that money in the stock market and make a killing. This is nuts. The implicit, perfectly safe, real investment return from waiting to collect higher benefits is three times more than you can earn on the market, based on historical averages.

The sixth reason is that Social Security recipients fear future cuts in benefits because they’ve heard Social Security is insolvent. But the politicians aren’t likely to cut benefits of current beneficiaries or people close to retirement. So a benefits cut is a worry for the young, not for those now retired or about to retire.

What Could Fix This Social Security Problem
How can retirees be kept from squandering trillions?

The study’s authors suggest eliminating the option to take retirement benefits early with exceptions for those with an incontrovertible need to do so.

This will force millions to work longer, which may not be a bad thing. But it’s very Big Brother social engineering.

United Income also suggests the Social Security Administration change how it frames claiming options to the public. Instead of calling age 62 the “early eligibility age,” the researchers say, claiming at 62 could be labeled “the minimum benefit age” and age 70 could be labeled “the maximum benefit age.”

A better option is to let some take a portion — say, one third — of his or her Social Security benefit early while letting the rest of the benefit grow. This would alleviate the cash flow constraints facing so many early beneficiaries. Mechanically, this would be fairly easy to implement.

Would this plan cost Social Security more money? Yes, based on proper accounting. But the additional costs are clearly worth it

The boomers, with the help of Uncle Sam and their employers, have made a financial mess of their retirement. As this new and highly valuable United Income study shows, the boomers are compounding their financial problems by making terrible Social Security decisions.

It’s time to turn this situation around.

Laurence J. Kotlikoff is co-author of Get What's Yours: The Secrets to Maxing Out Your Social Security, an economics professor at Boston University and president of Economic Security Planning, which creates financial planning software. He also writes a regular column for Forbes; his articles can be found here. He was an independent write-in candidate for President in the 2016 election.

Thursday, August 1, 2019

Urinary Tract Infections Affect Millions. The Cures Are Faltering.



As the infections become increasingly resistant to antibiotics, some standard treatments no longer work for an ailment that was once easily cured.


By Matt Richtel
July 13, 2019

For generations, urinary tract infections, one of the world’s most common ailments, have been easily and quickly cured with a simple course of antibiotics.

But there is growing evidence that the infections, which afflict millions of Americans a year, mostly women, are increasingly resistant to these medicines, turning a once-routine diagnosis into one that is leading to more hospitalizations, graver illnesses and prolonged discomfort from the excruciating burning sensation that the infection brings.

The New York City Department of Health has become so concerned about drug-resistant U.T.I.s, as they are widely known, that it introduced a new mobile phone app this month that gives doctors and nurses access to a list of strains of urinary tract infections and which drugs they are resistant to.

The department’s research found that a third of uncomplicated urinary tract infections caused by E. coli — the most common type now — were resistant to Bactrim, one of the most widely used drugs, and at least one fifth of them were resistant to five other common treatments.

 “This is crazy. This is shocking,” said Lance Price, director of the Antibiotic Resistance Action Center at George Washington University, who was not involved in the research.

The drug ampicillin, once a mainstay for treating the infections, has been abandoned as a gold standard because multiple strains of U.T.I.s are resistant to it. Some urinary tract infections now require treatment with heavy-duty intravenous antibiotics. Researchers last year reported in a study that a third of all U.T.I.s in Britain are resistant to “key antibiotics.”

Certainly, the day-to-day experience of having a U.T.I. is growing less routine for many women.

Carolina Barcelos, 38, a postdoctoral researcher in Berkeley, Calif., said she had several U.T.I.s as a teenager, all successfully treated with Bactrim. When she got one in February, her doctor also prescribed Bactrim, but this time it didn’t work.

Four days later, she returned and got a new prescription, for a drug called nitrofurantoin. It didn’t work either. Her pain worsened, and several days later, there was blood in her urine.

Her doctor prescribed a third drug, ciprofloxacin, the last of the three major front-line medicines, and cultured her urine. The culture showed her infection was susceptible to the new drug, but not the other two.

“Next time,” Dr. Barcelos said, “I’m going to ask them to do a culture right away. For eight days I was taking antibiotics that weren’t working for me.”


Bacteria are rebelling. They’re turning the tide against antibiotics by outsmarting our wonder drugs. This video explores the surprising reasons. Click on the video above to watch Revenge of the Bacteria: Why WeAre Losing The War. By Kassie Bracken, Matt Richtel and Ora DeKornfeld