https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/12/the-home-remedy-for-old-age/354680/
The “frailty course,” a gradual and medically complicated downslide,
was once exceptional but is now the likely path for half of today’s elders.
Home-based primary care comes in many varieties, but they
share a treatment model and a business model. The treatment model begins from
the counterintuitive premise that health care should not always be medical
care. “It’s not medical treatment, it’s helping meet personal goals,” Brad
Stuart said. “It’s about ‘Who is this person, and what do they want in their
life?’ ”
In Sutter’s Advanced Illness Management program, known as
aim, each patient is assigned to a team of nurses, social workers, physical and
occupational therapists, and others. The group works under the direction of a
primary-care physician, and meets weekly to discuss patient and family
problems—anything from a stroke or depression to an unexplained turn for the
worse or an unsafe home.
I sat in on some of these team meetings. A social worker and
a nurse talked over a case and decided they needed to make a home visit
together; a doctor suggested a medication change; the various members of the
group compared notes on one patient’s hospitalization while discussing whether
another’s 911 call might have been averted. Strikingly, patients were presented
not as bundles of syndromes—as medical charts—but as having personal goals,
such as making a trip or getting back on their feet. The team tries to think
about meeting patients’ goals rather than performing procedures. An advantage
of the multidisciplinary approach is that over time, as clients’ conditions
change, the group can recalibrate the mix of services and providers, to avoid
jarring transitions. “Once in aim, always in aim,” one coordinator told a
patient’s family. Over several years, a person might move from independence and
occasional social-worker visits to hospice care and finally death, all within
aim, and mostly at home.
One recent morning, while I was waiting at Sutter to
accompany a nurse and a social worker on a home visit, the phone rang. It was a
panicked caregiver whose charge had rectal bleeding. A case manager alerted the
patient’s regular nurse so that she could make a visit right away, almost
certainly averting a 911 call, and possibly an ambulance/ER/hospitalization
ordeal. Later, in Washington, D.C., accompanying George Taler on house calls, I
met a 92-year-old man afflicted with hypertension, blindness, gout, and
diabetes, who had been in and out of the hospital before entering Washington
Hospital Center’s home-care program in 2007, and who has not been back since—a
fact that pleased him. (“I hate the hospital.”) I also met a 75-year-old woman
who had recently had a massive stroke; her daughter said Taler’s program had
averted at least two ambulance calls since then.
Sutter figures that the program, by keeping patients out of
the hospital whenever possible, saves Medicare upwards of $2,000 a month on
each patient, maybe more. The VA, for its part, says its program reduces
hospital days for its patients by more than a third and reduces combined costs
to the VA and Medicare by about 13 percent.
But now we come to the business model, which has been
problematic. For doctors, nurses, health systems, and insurers, providing
in-home service costs money. Medicare pays for hospitalization, but it does not
pay for much by way of in-home care, or for social workers, or for time spent
coordinating complex cases and traveling to homes and talking with caregivers.
Where in-home primary care has existed, it has tended to be a foundation-funded
experiment, or a charitable project, or part of a vertically integrated system
like the VA, which can capture any savings. The home-care program at Washington
Hospital Center runs at a 30 percent loss. Meanwhile, hospitals lose “heads in
beds,” and therefore revenue. Medicare—which is to say, taxpayers—may save
money, but it has no mechanism either to track savings or to pay providers and
insurers for hospitalizations that do not happen.
This is why Brad Stuart was frustrated for so many years. He
could see the path forward, and others could see it, but it was blocked. Today,
though, he’s feeling optimistic. The path is clearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment